2 Dr.
Natana J. DeLong-Bas writes in his article “The New social Media and the Arab Spring” (Oxford Islamic Studies Online) that social media played a pivotal role in the Arab Spring. Modern digital technology brought about political change
without violence because 55-70 percent of the population in Tunisia, Libya, and
Egypt are under the age of thirty. Delong-Bas are more likely to turn to the
Internet “finding it more reliable and accurate and less filled with government
propaganda.”
The author
continues by stating that the seeds of revolution were sown through the
Internet and the loss of control of media by the local governments. What those
governments could not foresee was that the youth used the Internet to exchange
information and to “use cyberspace to ...assemble to discuss ideas, concerns,
and complaints...” The Internet was new territory; websites became to “generate
awareness campaigns”, “to proclaim their goals, and “to compile databases of
like-minded individuals.”
The author
also notes that other digital tools such as Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter are
open source areas where anyone can post their opinions whether for or against.
Delong-Bas says that social media has been credited with triggering the
revolutions. He states that it was “the speed at which communications were transmitted”
accelerated the end result.
The author
finishes by saying there are many lessons to be learned from the successful use
of social media. The first is that there is no monopoly over how it is used or
for what purpose. The strong voice of women that have not been heard in the
past has challenged the stereotype of the Muslim woman. Women have also
harnessed this medium to make others aware of social concerns. He concludes
that social media has opened the door to new ways of creative thinking, including
assembling, organizing and planning activities from political to social change.
Sara
Reardon, “Was the Arab Spring really a Facebook Revolution?” writes about
Kathleen Carley’s analysis of media articles. Using the latest software,
Carley’s team examined 400,000 articles and determined that social media
correlated with uprisings in some countries, but it was not universal.
“Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube played a role in the way the Arab Spring
unfolded, their influence was far less critical ... the reason was social
influence, not social networking.”
Reardon
correlates Carley’s conclusions with other authors. Philip Howard of the
University of Washington in Seattle notes that “the protesters tended to be
young, tech-savvy and included women.” He goes on to say that terrorists and
the urban poor were not really involved.
I think this is an excellent post. It was very interesting to see how much social networks and texting made a difference in Arab Spring. I also read an article that said these networks were used to teach the Americans how to properly go about their own protest. I would have liked to see, however, your opinion on the article and on the event. Your summary was fantastic but I would also like to hear your voice as well.
ReplyDeleteFantastic job!